linux-kernel - Re: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a5d9929e0906290153g305427c6j37f96db060cb4738@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:53:41 +0100
From:	Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crashes during boot on 2.6.30 / 2.6.31-rc, random programs

Hello

Well, it doesnt complain about MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES anymore, but
now it gives me:

BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
turning off the locking correctness validator.
Pid: 1672, comm: qemu-kvm Not tainted 2.6.30-wl #2
Call Trace:
 [<c07da76f>] ? printk+0x22/0x3b
 [<c0463de9>] __lock_acquire+0xa77/0xb05
 [<c0463f2e>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0xeb
 [<c04be96c>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
 [<c04be96c>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
 [<c07dd476>] _spin_lock_nest_lock+0x30/0x71
 [<c04be96c>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
 [<c04be96c>] mm_take_all_locks+0xb3/0xf1
 [<c04cc741>] do_mmu_notifier_register+0x9f/0x14e
 [<c04cc83d>] mmu_notifier_register+0x1e/0x31
 [<f9e461b8>] kvm_dev_ioctl+0xfd/0x25d [kvm]
 [<f9e460bb>] ? kvm_dev_ioctl+0x0/0x25d [kvm]
 [<c04e4df6>] vfs_ioctl+0x29/0x91
 [<c04e52f4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x496/0x4e3
 [<c07dfb82>] ? do_page_fault+0x229/0x26a
 [<c0408e41>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd
 [<c0461218>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x39/0x143
 [<c07dfb82>] ? do_page_fault+0x229/0x26a
 [<c04e5396>] sys_ioctl+0x55/0x86
 [<c04037f3>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38

which looks like its younger brother :-). (Also appears on other
programs, not just qemu-kvm)

Should i increase its value too? Am i not just masking something else
by doing this?

Thank you for your time,
Joao Correia
Centro de Informatica
Universidade da Beira Interior
Portugal

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Américo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Joao
> Correia<joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>
> Hello,
>
>> Since midway through the 2.6.30 series, and continuing on the rc1 for
>> .31, im having this at every boot, during the boot process:
>>
>> (...)
>> Jun 26 21:07:03 hightech kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 10
>> Jun 26 21:07:03 hightech kernel: lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
>> Jun 26 21:07:03 hightech kernel: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
>> Jun 26 21:07:03 hightech kernel: turning off the locking correctness validator.
>> Jun 26 21:07:03 hightech kernel: Pid: 672, comm: modprobe Not tainted
>> 2.6.31-rc1 #1
>
> Could you please try the patch from Ingo below?
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/852005
>
> Does it help?
>
> That value was already doubled from 131072 when the last time it was seen. :)
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/