[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629093413.GC3845@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:34:13 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, davidel@...ilserver.org,
oleg@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fbl@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
htejun@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix race in the receive/select
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 09:35:28PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> David Miller a écrit :
> > From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >>> Perhaps we can add
> >>>
> >>> void sock_poll_wait(struct file *file, struct sock *sk, poll_table *pt)
> >>> {
> >>> if (pt) {
> >>> poll_wait(file, sk->sk_sleep, pt);
> >>> /*
> >>> * fat comment
> >>> */
> >>> smp_mb(); // or smp_mb__after_unlock();
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >> That'd be fine IMHO. Are DaveM and Eric OK?
> >
> > No objections from me.
>
> Very good :)
>
> Jiri, please respin a patch with this idea from Oleg
>
> (We'll have to check all calls to poll_wait() in net tree)
>
> Thanks everybody
>
thanks a lot! :) I'll send out new patch shortly..
I'll include all the poll_wait calls change I'm kind of sure of,
and list of others I'm not, so we can discuss them.
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists