[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246271880.21450.13.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:38:00 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:19 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:19 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Well, it's not easy to come up with something strong.
> > I agree, that stack gives you almost all you need.
> >
> > HEX dump can give you a _tip_ in case you're not sure.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not against it in any way. If Catalin is
> interested in merging this kind of functionality, go for it! You might
> want to consider unconditionally enabling the hexdump. If the
> information is valuable, we should print it all the time.
Though I prefer to do as much as possible in user space, I think this
feature would be useful.
Anyway, I may not include it before the next merging window (when is
actually the best time for new features). Currently, my main focus is on
reducing the false positives.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists