linux-kernel - Re: Found the commit that causes the OOMs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29869.1246289271@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:27:51 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"elladan@...imo.com" <elladan@...imo.com>,
	"npiggin@...e.de" <npiggin@...e.de>,
	"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Found the commit that causes the OOMs


Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:

> Totally, I can't understand this situation.
> Now, this page allocation is order zero and It is just likely GFP_HIGHUSER.
> So it's unlikely interrupt context.
> 
> Buddy already has enough fallback DMA32, I think.
> Why kernel can't allocate page for order 0 ?
> Is it allocator bug ?

I don't know, but I've got you some more information.

I can reproduce the problem much, much quicker, it turns out by just running
msgctl11 from the LTP syscalls testsuite a few times.  No NFSD traffic this
time to confuse the issue or any other tests.

I also managed to get a list of the most in-use slabs at the time:

	002732 shmem_inode_cache         2750    800      5      1
	003143 fs_cache                  3180     72     53      1
	003145 files_cache               3145    728      5      1
	003150 mm_struct                 3150    840      9      2
	003152 task_xstate               3160    512      8      1
	003174 sighand_cache             3180   2112      3      2
	003185 task_struct               3185   1632      5      2
	003192 signal_cache              3192    928      4      1
	003192 task_delay_info           3304    136     28      1
	003205 pid                       3330    104     37      1
	003262 cred_jar                  3381    168     23      1
	003438 size-2048                 3438   2072      3      2
	003589 inode_cache               3606    608      6      1
	004570 size-192                  4572    216     18      1
	007644 size-64                   7656     88     44      1
	007687 sysfs_dir_cache           7733    104     37      1
	007875 selinux_inode_security    7920     96     40      1
	008149 dentry                    8190    216     18      1
	013692 size-128                 13900    152     25      1
	047134 vm_area_struct           47440    192     20      1
	182903 size-32                 183178     56     67      1
	312010 avtab_node              312081     48     77      1

This is from /proc/slabinfo, with the first two columns swapped to make
sorting on it easier.  I've also attached the OOM report.

David

msgctl11 invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=1, oom_adj=0
msgctl11 cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0
Pid: 12170, comm: msgctl11 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1-cachefs #146
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8107207e>] ? oom_kill_process.clone.0+0xa9/0x245
 [<ffffffff81074168>] ? drain_local_pages+0x0/0x13
 [<ffffffff81072345>] ? __out_of_memory+0x12b/0x142
 [<ffffffff810723c6>] ? out_of_memory+0x6a/0x94
 [<ffffffff81074a90>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x42e/0x51d
 [<ffffffff81091546>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x353/0x69c
 [<ffffffff81031424>] ? copy_process+0x93/0x1136
 [<ffffffff81091b24>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x83/0xc5
 [<ffffffff81031424>] ? copy_process+0x93/0x1136
 [<ffffffff81029da3>] ? update_curr+0x53/0xdf
 [<ffffffff810820c1>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x5dd/0x62f
 [<ffffffff81032606>] ? do_fork+0x13f/0x2ba
 [<ffffffff81022c32>] ? do_page_fault+0x1f8/0x20d
 [<ffffffff8100b0d3>] ? stub_clone+0x13/0x20
 [<ffffffff8100ad6b>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
DMA per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
CPU    1: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:   0
CPU    1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  25
Active_anon:75004 active_file:0 inactive_anon:2192
 inactive_file:0 unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
 free:2200 slab:37795 mapped:618 pagetables:60369 bounce:0
DMA free:3928kB min:60kB low:72kB high:88kB active_anon:3024kB inactive_anon:128kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:15364kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 968 968 968
DMA32 free:4748kB min:3948kB low:4932kB high:5920kB active_anon:297092kB inactive_anon:8640kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:992032kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
DMA: 0*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3928kB
DMA32: 476*4kB 56*8kB 14*16kB 4*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 4624kB
1154 total pagecache pages
0 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
Free swap  = 0kB
Total swap = 0kB
255744 pages RAM
5589 pages reserved
248214 pages shared
219940 pages non-shared
Out of memory: kill process 4164 (msgctl11) score 119366 or a child
Killed process 10211 (msgctl11)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/