[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629170418.GA17937@amt.cnet>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:04:18 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, avi@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/4] kvm: convert bus to slots_lock
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:38:51PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:50:31PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> > > index 148c52a..1851aec 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8259.c
> > > @@ -548,6 +548,6 @@ struct kvm_pic *kvm_create_pic(struct kvm *kvm)
> > > * Initialize PIO device
> > > */
> > > kvm_iodevice_init(&s->dev, &picdev_ops);
> > > - kvm_io_bus_register_dev(&kvm->pio_bus, &s->dev);
> > > + kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, &kvm->pio_bus, &s->dev);
> > > return s;
> >
> > case KVM_CREATE_PIT2:
> > create_pit:
> > mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > kvm_io_bus_register_dev
> > down_write(slots_lock);
> >
> > But the order is slots_lock -> kvm->lock.
> >
> > (you might want to update the comment on top of kvm_main.c to
> > reflect that).
>
> Good catch. I think it's easiest to replace kvm->lock by slots_lock
> here as well. Does something like the following make sense?
> If yes I'll roll it up in the series.
Looks good. Also please update the comment on top of kvm_main.c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists