[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629012558.GA22666@Krystal>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:25:58 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching
* Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@...k.pl) wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
Yep, it still exists. Venkatesh Pallipadi from Intel is working on it.
We need to figure out a proper way to fix policy rwlock vs dbs_mutex vs
timer mutex dependency.
Mathieu
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424
> Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching
> Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (29 days old)
> References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html
> Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
>
>
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists