[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246351114.2476.38.camel@ht.satnam>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:08:34 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 -tip] perf_counter tools: Add support to set of
multiple events in one shot
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 05:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The above patterns i suggested _already cover_ 'multiple events'.
>
> We might define further aliases like:
>
> all := "*"
> all-sw := "sw-*"
>
> but it should all be in terms of patterns and regular expressions,
> not via some hardcoded special-case thing as your posted patches
> did.
>
It seems to me very confusing and needs lot of book-keeping and need to
rewrite whole tools/perf/util/parse-events.c because :
* means all perf_event_types :
PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE,
PERF_TYPE_RAW
hw-* means all hardware events :
PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE,
PERF_TYPE_RAW
sw-* means all software events :
PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT
*cache* means all cache based events :
PERF_COUNT_CACHE_REFERENCES, /* Generalized H/W */
PERF_COUNT_CACHE_MISSES, /* Generalized H/W */
PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE, /* Generalized Cache */
*write* means all write based events :
(L1D, WRITE, ACCESS),
(L1D, WRITE, MISS),
(LL, WRITE, ACCESS),
(LL, WRITE, MISS),
(DTLB, WRITE, ACCESS),
(DTLB, WRITE, MISS)
Please let me know why it looks complex to me, is it really complex or I am going in wrong direction.
Thanks,
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists