[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4A4812.4070804@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:14:58 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] enable x2APIC without interrupt remapping under KVM
On 06/30/2009 08:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Gleb Natapov<gleb@...hat.com> writes:
>
>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:18:19AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>> how about kexec second kernel in KVM ?
>>>
>>> x2apic_preenabled will be set in second kernel.
>>>
>>>
>> By the way anybody knows why kexec does not use BIOS reset code
>> (cmos 0xf offset) to jump into new kernel after hard reset?
>>
>
> After a hard reset. That simply isn't possible. A hard
> reset clears everything even memory.
>
>
So the jump-to-vector reset code cannot work on real hardware? It works
in qemu, but of course that's easy.
> You might be able to get a full cpu reset but not a reset of the I/O
> devices.
>
> The premise of kexec is that we are doing things on our own, and don't
> get a 3rd piece of software involved that has not been heavily tested
> on the path we want to use. Occassionally it is a pain to do everything
> ourselves but at least when we do and we test it we know it is going
> to work.
>
> Cpu designers lately seem fond of adding features that require all
> kind of coordination to turn on and off. We handle the hardware
> virtualization mode features now, and if x2apic has similar problems
> being turned on and off I am certain we can handle that case in a
> similar fashion.
>
> When we can my preference is to keep code like that out of the
> kexec on panic path if we can figure out how to write the software
> to do something reasonable.
>
> Once we figure out how to work without putting the interrupt controllers
> in legacy mode to handle the timer interrupts I expect all kinds of
> things will become simpler.
>
I think it makes sense to add full reset support as a non-default
option. Leaving hardware running and dmaing left and right has its risks.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists