linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] enable x2APIC without interrupt remapping under KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:03:07 +0300
From:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] enable x2APIC without interrupt remapping under KVM

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:44:54AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > KVM would like to provide x2APIC interface to a guest without emulating
> >> > interrupt remapping device. The reason KVM prefers guest to use x2APIC
> >> > is that x2APIC interface is better virtualizable and provides better
> >> > performance than mmio xAPIC interface:
> >> >
> >> > - msr exits are faster than mmio (no page table walk, emulation)
> >> > - no need to read back ICR to look at the busy bit
> >> > - one 64 bit ICR write instead of two 32 bit writes
> >> > - shared code with the Hyper-V paravirt interface
> >> >     
> >> > Included patch changes x2APIC enabling logic to enable it even if IR
> >> > initialization failed, but kernel runs under KVM and no apic id is
> >> > greater than 255 (if there is one spec requires BIOS to move to x2apic
> >> > mode before starting an OS).
> >> 
> >> 
> >> How common is hotplug hardware in kvm?  In particular hotplug cpus?
> >> 
> > It works for Linux guests.
> 
> >
> >> To support that seriously you need interrupt remapping.
> >> 
> > Can you explain why?
> 
> Because ioapics don't fully function according to spec,
> and the interrupt code on the hotplug path is a horrible
> terrible broken hack for ioapics.
> 
Considering that interrupt remapping is fairly new feature
are you saying that hotplug (pci and cpu) on x86 is a horrible
hack on Linux?

> It is better than nothing but it certainly is not something
> I would expect to work all of the time.
> 
Because of horrible code or non-complaint ioapic implementation out
there? If later this is not a big issue for KVM.

> Interrupt remapping is the one case where we have hardware
> that works according to spec and that works reasonably well.
> 
I am sure when there was only one ioapic implementation in existence
it worked according to a spec (and if not spec was changed :)) Give
interrupt remapping some time and than we will see how above statement
holds.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/