[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m17hyt1p8s.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:43:47 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"avi\@redhat.com" <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] enable x2APIC without interrupt remapping under KVM
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> writes:
> Considering that interrupt remapping is fairly new feature
> are you saying that hotplug (pci and cpu) on x86 is a horrible
> hack on Linux?
Just the current cpu hotplug path.
>> It is better than nothing but it certainly is not something
>> I would expect to work all of the time.
>>
> Because of horrible code or non-complaint ioapic implementation out
> there? If later this is not a big issue for KVM.
Both. And even in spec ioapics can't be made to work 100% reliably.
>> Interrupt remapping is the one case where we have hardware
>> that works according to spec and that works reasonably well.
>>
> I am sure when there was only one ioapic implementation in existence
> it worked according to a spec (and if not spec was changed :)) Give
> interrupt remapping some time and than we will see how above statement
> holds.
What we need for cpu hotplug/unplug is on the tested path now.
That is a significant difference.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists