[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4A8804.1040004@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:47:48 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 3/3] kprobes: cleanup: use list instead of hlist
for insn_pages
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Use struct list instead of struct hlist for managing insn_pages,
>> because insn_pages doesn't use hash table.
>
>> struct kprobe_insn_page {
>> - struct hlist_node hlist;
>> + struct list_head list;
>
> Hm, you know that this increases the size of kprobe_insn_page by 4/8
> bytes, right?
Sure, that will increase size.
> hlists are not just used for hashes - but also when we want a more
> compact / smaller list head.
Oh, I thought hlists are used for hash tables...
>
> How many kprobe_insn_page's can be allocated in the system,
> maximally?
It's depends on how many probes you will use, but logically,
1 kprobe_insn_pages is allocated per 4096/16 = 256 probes.
So, if you use 25,600 probes on your system, memory
consumption will increase 400/800 bytes.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists