[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246400345.2247.4.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:19:05 -0500
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FAT: optimize FSINFO writeback
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 05:57 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> steve@...idescorp.com writes:
>
> > Only write the FSINFO block back to disk when its contents change.
> > This optimization can be important when the underlying physical media
> > can wear out, i.e. Flash.
>
> I have no objection to this though. Was this tested on recent version?
I tested it on 2.6.30.
> Well, now, we are using sb->s_dirty for fsinfo, so I'm wondering why
> this happen frequently.
My scenario was modifying a sector of an existing file and using
fdatasync() to flush it. The FSINFO sector was being updated even though
nothing about the FAT layout had changed.
>
> Thanks.
Regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS!
www.digidescorp.com Earthling, return my space modulator!"
#include <standard.disclaimer>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists