[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090630224018.GJ6760@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:40:18 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve lpage NUMA support
> How would you allow that guest to stay on 2 virtual CPUs but still
> be able to hot-plug many other CPUs if the guest context rises above
> its original CPU utilization?
(unless you're planning to rewrite lots of possible cpu users all over
the tree) -- the only way is to keep the percpu area small and preallocate.
As long as the per cpu data size stays reasonable (not more than a 100-200k)
that's very doable. It probably won't work with 4096 guest CPUs without
wasting too much memory, but then I don't think we have any Hypervisor
that scales to that many CPUs anyways, so it's not the biggest
concern. For the 128CPU case it works (although i might need
to enlarge vmalloc area a bit on 32bit)
Unfortunately a few debugging subsystems seem to currently eat
much more, but those just need to be fixed to only allocate
state for actually running CPUs, not just possible ones.
I suspect we need a scripts/percpubloat.pl
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists