[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4AA0ED.2020304@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:34:05 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve
lpage NUMA support
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello, Christoph.
>>
>> Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
>>> I looked at allocating for online cpus only a couple of years
>>> back but at that per cpu state was kept for offlined cpus in per
>>> cpu areas. There are numerous assumptions in per cpu handling
>>> all over the kernel that a percpu area is always available.
>> The plan is to allocate and keep percpu areas for cpus which have
>> ever been up. There'll be no taking down of percpu areas.
>> Conversion from possible to has_ever_been_up should be much easier
>> than possible -> online. State keeping will work fine too.
>
> That sounds like a very sane plan.
>
> Ingo
Yes, percpu area dynamic *de*-allocation would almost certainly be a
nightmare.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists