[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090630021612.GD24061@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:16:13 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:01:35PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:56:38 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jesse,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got conflicts in
> > arch/ia64/include/asm/pci.h, arch/mn10300/include/asm/pci.h and
> > include/asm-generic/pci.h between commit
> > a6c140969b4685f9b9f6773c0760f55ca66d1825 ("Delete
> > pcibios_select_root") from Linus' tree and commit
> > a53cd7419b22c14b5a1e6859a940fb6bfa77963f ("PCI: remove
> > pcibios_scan_all_fns()") from the pci tree.
> >
> > Just context changes (adjacent removals). I fixed it up (see below)
> > and can carry the fix for a while.
>
> Ah ok, thanks. That'll get fixed up after I send the current for-linus
> bits over and refresh my PCI tree.
I think you need to pull from Linus' tree before you send the bits over
-- that's a conflict between Linus' tree and your tree, and you don't
want to annoy Linus by making him merge them ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists