[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629221509.1d307184@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:15:09 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13522] BUG: scheduling while atomic
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:28:53 +0300
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by> wrote:
> On (06/29/09 15:41), Alan Cox wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a
> > > report of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known
> > > regressions from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be
> > > listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> > Yes although getting people seeing to test with might_sleep()
> > checks in the tty layer demonstrate the tty layer isn't calling
> > into ppp with irqs disabled when it shouldn't so I'm at a loss as
> > to whether this is a network bug, a scheduler bug or something else.
> >
> > The schedule error in __tasklet_schedule() is itself rather
> > peicular.
> >
>
> Hello Alan, Rafael,
>
> BUG is still here...
can you enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, and then run this through
scripts/markup_oops.pl ? With a bit of luck it'll point to the exact
code that's going wrong...
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists