[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906292238560.7434@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it. This particular
> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> > the system has 4K pages. Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
>
> If the current behavior is not changed, I will be forced to disable
> SLUB debugging, which will explicitly lead to errors that are
> undiagnosed.
You're buying debugging support at the cost of increased memory
consumption when you enable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON and that's causing the
page allocation failures because of fragmentation. To reduce the minimum
order required for caches such as kmalloc-4096, you'd have to disable
debugging for that particular cache. It's my opinion that such a
configuration should not be the default, however.
You could argue adding `slub_debug=-,kmalloc-4096' support from the
command line, but CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should not change its well-defined
purpose of enabling debugging on all slab caches. Otherwise the rest of
us would be forced to add `slub_debug=,kmalloc-4096' for consistent
behavior with older kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists