linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: exlclude release rmdir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090701100412.d59122d9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:04:12 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: exlclude release rmdir

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:27:02 -0700
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:

> It only looks "cosmeticized" because of the evolution of your fix. The
> first patch added a new function that exposed internal details of
> cgroups, and the second patch removes the addition in favour of a
> different new function that doesn't expose internal details as much; a
> single patch that just adds the simpler new function is easier to
> judge as intuitively correct (separately from Daisuke's testing) than
> one that exposes more internal details.
> 
ok, I'll post again.

BTW, do you have patches for NOOP/signal cgroup we discussed a half year ago ?

Thanks,
-Kame

> Paul
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/