[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4ABD8F.40907@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:36:15 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To: Attila Kinali <attila@...ali.ch>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Long lasting MM bug when swap is smaller than RAM
On 06/30/2009 03:58 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Moin,
>
> There has been a bug back in the 2.4.17 days that is somehow
> triggered by swap being smaller than RAM, which i thought had
> been fixed long ago, reappeared on one of the machines i manage.
>
> <history>
It's quite unlikely what you are seeing is at all related to that
problem. The VM subsystem has been hugely changed since then.
> root@...suki:/home/attila# free -m
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 6023 5919 103 0 415 3873
> -/+ buffers/cache: 1630 4393
> Swap: 3812 879 2932
> ---
>
> I want to point your attention at the fact that the machine has now
> more RAM installed than it previously had RAM+Swap (ie before the upgrade).
> Ie there is no reason it would need to swap out, at least not so much.
>
> What is even more interesting is the amount of swap used over time.
> Sampled every day at 10:00 CEST:
>
> ---
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:00:01 +0200 (CEST)
> Mem: 6023 5893 130 0 405 3834
> Swap: 3812 190 3622
..
> As you can see, although memory usage didnt change much over time,
> swap usage increased from 190MB to 826MB in about two weeks.
>
> As i'm pretty much clueless when it commes to how the linux VM works,
> i would appreciate it if someone could give me some pointers on how
> to figure out what causes this bug so that it could be fixed finally.
You didn't post what the swap usage history before the upgrade was. But
swapping does not only occur if memory is running low. If disk usage is
high then non-recently used data may be swapped out to make more room
for disk caching.
Also, by increasing memory from 2GB to 6GB on a 32-bit kernel, some
memory pressure may actually be increased since many kernel data
structures can only be in low memory (the bottom 896MB). The more that
the system memory is increased the more the pressure on low memory can
become. Using a 64-bit kernel avoids this problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists