[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906301936.20818.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:36:20 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@...il.com>,
Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"openezx-devel" <openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MMC/pxamci: workaround regulator framework bugs
On Monday 29 June 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
> At the minute the regulator API actually copes pretty well with this -
> the only problem I'm aware of is with drivers like the MMC driver which
> require exclusive control of the regulator.
Which is a fairly typical situation for power-aware drivers.
Which belies your claim that the regulator API "copes pretty well".
It'd be more accurate to say "broken-as-designed", since you have
rejected numerous attempts to fix this, yet not fixed it yourself.
> With other drivers the core
> API can clean up after startup and the drivers never need to worry about
> fixing things up.
MMC isn't particularly unusual. It's just the first place this
type problem tends to come up. Expect more such problelms as
folkl actually try to *use* the regulator framework.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists