[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4AE73A.7050907@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:34:02 +0900
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
CC: kristen.c.accardi@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pciehp resume handler - racy?
Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been hacking on the PCI hotplug driver otherwise known as
> eeepc-laptop. At one point I reliably triggered a race on resume. In
> the hot-unplug case, it seemed that the resume handler would try to
> remove the PCI device at the same time as an acpi notification (run in a
> workqueue) tried to do the same thing. The result was an OOPS. My
> conclusion is that the PCI hotplug core does not protect against
> multiple simultaneous removals of the same device.
Though I don't know hotplug driver for eeepc-laptop at all, I guess
it doesn't use pci_hp_register(), which is for registering a hotplug
slot to pci hotplug core. The pci_hp_register() prevents a hot-plug
slot from being managed by multiple hotplug controller drivers at
the same time. Using pci_hp_register() would be one of the solution
for eeepc-laptop hotplug driver.
>
> pciehp appears to have an analogous problem. Assuming pciehp_force is
> set, the resume handler can hot-unplug the device. The interrupt
> handler could try to hot-unplug the device at the same time. Should the
> resume handler take the slot mutex to avoid this problem?
>
Hot-plug operations for the same hotplug slot are serialized by
crit_sect mutex of struct controller in pciehp_enable_slot() and
pciehp_disable_slot(). So I don't think multiple hot-plug
operations for the same slot would be executed at the same time.
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
> diff --faked-up a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> @@ -382,15 +382,18 @@ static int pciehp_resume (struct pcie_device *dev)
> /* reinitialize the chipset's event detection logic */
> pcie_enable_notification(ctrl);
>
> t_slot = pciehp_find_slot(ctrl, ctrl->slot_device_offset);
> + mutex_lock(&t_slot->lock);
>
> /* Check if slot is occupied */
> t_slot->hpc_ops->get_adapter_status(t_slot, &status);
> if (status)
> pciehp_enable_slot(t_slot);
> else
> pciehp_disable_slot(t_slot);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&t_slot->lock);
> }
> return 0;
> }
> #endif /* PM */
>
>
> Regards
> Alan
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists