linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] also discard .*init sections after module initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:52:26 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc:	sam@...nborg.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Abbott <tabbott@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] also discard .*init sections after module initialization

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:27:26 pm Jan Beulich wrote:
> Just like .init, these sections are supposed to be unneeded after init,
> and modpost warns about improper section references anyway.

Tim Abbot had a section renaming patch, for -ffunction-sections.  Can we kill 
two birds with one stone and have a unique string for init sections, and 
another for exit sections?

> Likewise
> for .*exit which, other than .exit, aren't needed for the module unload
> path.

Currently true, but I can't see that being true in general.

If we're going to abstract init detection, it would be good to wrap init 
section renaming (for powerpc64 at least) too.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/