lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090701100432.2d328e46.attila@kinali.ch>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:04:32 +0200
From:	Attila Kinali <attila@...ali.ch>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Long lasting MM bug when swap is smaller than RAM

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:36:15 -0600
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com> wrote:

> On 06/30/2009 03:58 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> > Moin,
> >
> > There has been a bug back in the 2.4.17 days that is somehow
> > triggered by swap being smaller than RAM, which i thought had
> > been fixed long ago, reappeared on one of the machines i manage.
> >
> > <history>
> 
> It's quite unlikely what you are seeing is at all related to that 
> problem. The VM subsystem has been hugely changed since then.

That's why i thought this problem was fixed.

> You didn't post what the swap usage history before the upgrade was. 

Because i don't have any hard data on this. I checked it by hand
from time to time and we never had more than a few MB of swap used.

> But 
> swapping does not only occur if memory is running low. If disk usage is 
> high then non-recently used data may be swapped out to make more room 
> for disk caching.

Hmm..I didn't know this.. thanks!

 
> Also, by increasing memory from 2GB to 6GB on a 32-bit kernel, some 
> memory pressure may actually be increased since many kernel data 
> structures can only be in low memory (the bottom 896MB).

Interesting. But shouldnt memory be "swapped" to highmem first
before going out onto disk?

> The more that 
> the system memory is increased the more the pressure on low memory can 
> become. Using a 64-bit kernel avoids this problem.

Unfortunately, the CPU we have is still a pure 32bit CPU, so this option
cannot be used.

			Attila Kinali
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ