[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4B2351.5010300@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:50:25 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: fix trace_print_seq()
We will lose something if trace_seq->buffer[0] is 0, because the copy length
is calculated by strlen() in seq_puts(), so using seq_write() instead of
seq_puts().
There have a example:
after reboot:
# echo kmemtrace > current_tracer
# echo 0 > options/kmem_minimalistic
# cat trace
# tracer: kmemtrace
#
#
Nothing is exported, because the first byte of trace_seq->buffer[ ]
is KMEMTRACE_USER_ALLOC.
( the value of KMEMTRACE_USER_ALLOC is zero, seeing
kmemtrace_print_alloc_user() in kernel/trace/kmemtrace.c)
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
index 7938f3a..e0c2545 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ void trace_print_seq(struct seq_file *m, struct trace_seq *s)
{
int len = s->len >= PAGE_SIZE ? PAGE_SIZE - 1 : s->len;
- s->buffer[len] = 0;
- seq_puts(m, s->buffer);
+ seq_write(m, s->buffer, len);
trace_seq_init(s);
}
--
1.6.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists