[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4B3007.7080303@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:44:39 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidel@...ilserver.org
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref_get
interface
On 06/29/2009 07:52 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> One idea I had to make it even clearer was to have a shutdown list
>> of irqfds per-kvm, together with the items list, and make work_struct for
>> shutdown global, not per-irqfd. We can then unconditionally do
>> list_move + schedule_work to shut down an irqfd, and it's safe to do
>> even if it is already on the shutdown list - it just gets moved to tail.
>>
>>
>
> Hmm..I'm not sure that churn really buys us anything, tho. Technically
> the "active" bit is redundant with list_del_init()+list_empty() that I
> employed in previous versions. However, I made it explicit with the
> active bit to be more self-documenting. IMO, the latest code is pretty
> clear, and the change you are proposing is moving towards a slightly
> trickier variant like I originally had. I'd say "lets leave this as is".
>
Could retain self documentation by introducing a helper irqfd_active()
which does the list_blah() magic.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists