[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0907011030130.3066-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:34:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Arseniy Lartsev <ars3n@...dex.ru>
cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdc-acm: work around some broken devices
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Arseniy Lartsev wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 15:37:48 Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Yes, exactly. Please add greg@...ah.com into CC, add a Signed-off-by line
> > and resend.
> ok
>
> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Lartsev <ars3n at yandex dot ru>
> --- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ static void acm_rx_tasklet(unsigned long
> struct acm_ru *rcv;
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned char throttled;
> + struct usb_host_endpoint *ep;
>
> dbg("Entering acm_rx_tasklet");
>
> @@ -462,11 +463,20 @@ urbs:
>
> rcv->buffer = buf;
>
> - usb_fill_bulk_urb(rcv->urb, acm->dev,
> - acm->rx_endpoint,
> - buf->base,
> - acm->readsize,
> - acm_read_bulk, rcv);
> + ep = (usb_pipein(acm->rx_endpoint) ? acm->dev->ep_in : acm->dev->ep_out)
> + [usb_pipeendpoint(acm->rx_endpoint)];
Isn't acm->rx_endpoint always going to be IN?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists