[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090701145836.GA8480@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:58:36 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.L-H@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: patch kvm-add-vt-x-machine-check-support.patch added to
2.6.30-stable tree
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 05:47:15PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/01/2009 05:18 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 04:41:54PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> Should be in struct vmx_vcpu; otherwise ack.
> >>
> >
> > Done
> >
> > ---
> >
> > KVM: Add VT-x machine check support v4
> >
> > VT-x needs an explicit MC vector intercept to handle machine checks in the
> > hypervisor.
> >
> > It also has a special option to catch machine checks that happen
> > during VT entry.
> >
> > Do these interceptions and forward them to the Linux machine check
> > handler. Make it always look like user space is interrupted because
> > the machine check handler treats kernel/user space differently.
> >
> > Thanks to Huang Ying and Jiang Yunhong for help and testing.
> >
> >
>
> Ack, thanks. Stable boys, please use this instead of the patch from
> mainline and the two patches it dragged in.
So, I should use this instead of:
kvm-vmx-fix-handling-of-a-fault-during-nmi-unblocked-due-to-iret.patch
kvm-move-exit-due-to-nmi-handling-into-vmx_complete_interrupts.patch
kvm-add-vt-x-machine-check-support.patch
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists