[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246521342.8681.5.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:55:42 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] perf_counter tools: support annotation of live
kernel modules
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
(squirrels suggestions away for later reference)
> Btw, another thing: we are thinking about making -F 1000 (1 KHz
> auto-freq sampling) the default for perf top and perf record. This
> way we'd always gather enough data (and never too much or too little
> data), regardless of the intensity of the workload. Have you played
> with -F before, what's your general experience about it? It's
> particularly useful for 'rare' and highly fluctuating events like
> cache-misses.
>
> Maybe 1KHz is a bit too low - Oprofile defaults to 100000 cycles
> interval by default which is about 10 KHz on a 1GHz box and 30 KHz
> on a 3GHz box. Perhaps 10 KHz is a better default?
My default usage is 1000Hz to keep overhead low. Works fine for me.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists