[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090702113351.41037d87@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:33:51 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: tridge@...ba.org
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
john.lanza@...ux.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:42:39 +1000
tridge@...ba.org wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> > > There really was no such thing as "vfat" anyway. VFAT in the Windows
> >
> > In the eyes of the end user there is such a thing as vfat. This is about
> > expectations not technical issues.
>
> Do you have an example of an end user device that would be affected by
> this change, and which is never distributed in any of the countries
> where a varient of this patent exists?
You gave one: Microsoft Windows XP. Risk of very rare system crashes.
Thats enough in a high reliability environment to require the file system
in question is banned from use site wide at may locations. Can't have a
flash card bringing down a windows dependant US destroyer can they.
Getting "not vfat" by suprise is thus really really bad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists