[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090702114207.58724071@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:42:07 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: extend pipe() to support NULL argument.
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:18:49 +0800
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Amerigo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:36:41PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> >
> > Why? Why do you need this feature?
> >
> Are you familiar with splice() and tee()? They both use pipes as kernel buffers.
And are being used quite happily with the pipe() call. So what is the
problem ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists