linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86,kvm: Fix section mismatches in kvm.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A4C98DD.9010005@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:24:13 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,kvm: Fix section mismatches in kvm.c

On 07/02/2009 08:40 AM, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>   Impact: Fix section mismatch.
>
> The function paravirt_ops_setup() has been refering the variable
> no_timer_check, which is a __initdata. Thus generates the following
> warning. paravirt_ops_setup() function is called from kvm_guest_init()
> which is a __init function. So to fix this we mark paravirt_ops_setup
> as __init.
>    

Ingo, if you already have something queued up for 2.6.31, please tack 
this on.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/