[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090702163731.GA14267@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:37:31 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] cgroups: fix pid namespace bug
Quoting Paul Menage (menage@...gle.com):
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Li Zefan<lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > + cp = kzalloc(sizeof(*cp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!cp) {
> > + up_write(&cgrp->pids_mutex);
> > + kfree(pidarray);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > + cp->cgrp = cgrp;
> > + cp->pid_ns = pid_ns;
>
> You're storing an uncounted reference to the pid ns here - there's no
> guarantee that the pid_ns will outlive the open file.
Yeah I was thinking about that, but
1. the only way it won't outlive the open file is if the
task opens the file, hands the open fd over a
unix socket, then exits as the last task of its
pidns
2. We don't dereference the pid_ns, so there is no actual
safety issue. So it would become a problem only
if a new pidns gets created at that same address
*and* a task in the new pidns opens the same
tasks file.
Still, it wouldn't hurt to do get_pid_ns/put_pid_ns at the open
and release :)
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists