[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090702121728.2a7c93cd.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:17:28 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: lizf@...fujitsu.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] [RFC] Example multi-bindable subsystem: a
per-cgroup notes field
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:56:28 -0700
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:48 PM, KAMEZAWA
> Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, do we need to this "info" file as subsys ? How about making this as
> > default file set ? (if there are users.)
> >
>
> That would certainly be possible, and would be an alternative to
> having multi-bindable subsystem support.
>
> The advantage of adding multi-bindable subsystems is that you can
> avoid bloating the core cgroups code, by putting individual small
> cgroups features in their own code modules, and you get to decide at
> mount time which features are actually mounted; if they were part of
> the core cgroups files, then there would either need to be special
> mount options for each separate feature, or else no way to pick which
> features were mounted on each hierarchy.
>
Sure, thanks.
-Kame
> Paul
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists