[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246512767-2999-9-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:32:47 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] SELinux xfrm.c non trivial fixes.
Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>
Fix some comments.
Add some words to some comment's to sound proper.
---
security/selinux/xfrm.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
index 72b1845..4313064 100644
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
* CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM=y
* CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=m/y
* ISSUES:
- * 1. Caching packets, so they are not dropped during negotiation
- * 2. Emulating a reasonable SO_PEERSEC across machines
- * 3. Testing addition of sk_policy's with security context via setsockopt
+ * 1. Caching packets, so they are not dropped during negotiation.
+ * 2. Emulating a reasonable SO_PEERSEC across machines.
+ * 3. Testing addition of sk_policy's with security context via setsockopt.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -51,11 +51,11 @@
#include "objsec.h"
#include "xfrm.h"
-/* Labeled XFRM instance counter */
+/* Labeled XFRM instance counter. */
atomic_t selinux_xfrm_refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
/*
- * Returns true if an LSM/SELinux context
+ * Returns true if an LSM/SELinux context.
*/
static inline int selinux_authorizable_ctx(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
{
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static inline int selinux_authorizable_ctx(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
}
/*
- * Returns true if the xfrm contains a security blob for SELinux
+ * Returns true if the xfrm contains a security blob for SELinux.
*/
static inline int selinux_authorizable_xfrm(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir)
int rc;
u32 sel_sid;
- /* Context sid is either set to label or ANY_ASSOC */
+ /* Context sid is either set to label or ANY_ASSOC. */
if (ctx) {
if (!selinux_authorizable_ctx(ctx))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -118,18 +118,18 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_policy *
if (!xp->security)
if (x->security)
- /* unlabeled policy and labeled SA can't match */
+ /* Unlabeled policy and labeled SA can't match. */
return 0;
else
- /* unlabeled policy and unlabeled SA match all flows */
+ /* Unlabeled policy and unlabeled SA match all flows. */
return 1;
else
if (!x->security)
- /* unlabeled SA and labeled policy can't match */
+ /* Unlabeled SA and labeled policy can't match. */
return 0;
else
if (!selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
- /* Not a SELinux-labeled SA */
+ /* Not a SELinux-labeled SA. */
return 0;
state_sid = x->security->ctx_sid;
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall)
/*
* Security blob allocation for xfrm_policy and xfrm_state
- * CTX does not have a meaningful value on input
+ * CTX does not have a meaningful value on input.
*/
static int selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx, u32 sid)
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
goto out;
/*
- * Does the subject have permission to set security context?
+ * Does the subject have permission to set the security context?
*/
rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
--
1.6.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists