linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: atomic64_t should be 8 bytes aligned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090703061414.GA23990@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:14:14 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: atomic64_t should be 8 bytes aligned


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > 
> > So we probably need an __attribute__((aligned(8)) on atomic64_t 
> > definition as well, since alignof(atomic64_t) is 4, not 8 (!!!)
> 
> Ack. Ingo, Peter, I'm hoping you're collecting these things?

Yeah, of course.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/