[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090703000829.735976000@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:08:29 -0700
From: venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com
To: "Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"Thomas Renninger" <trenn@...e.de>,
"Venkatesh Pallipadi" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been
multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of
these problems.
This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a complete fix.
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.3/01073.html
I am currently running some stress tests to make sure there are no issues with
these patches. But, wanted to send them out for review/comments/testing
before I head out for the long weekend.
If this patchset seems sane, the first patch in the patchset should also get
into 30.stable.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists