[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090703100834.6cb241b6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:08:34 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: lennart@...ttering.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: add an event interface
> Just a side-note, please run new patches through
> scripts/checkpatch.pl:
>
> total: 4 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 294 lines checked
Given the code doesn't currently *work* yet but is a first draft its
hardly important and there are better uses of time than playing
checkpatch policeman.
> - the copy_from_user() in vt_event_wait_ioctl() could be shortened
> if we didnt pass in an unsigned long (which is pointless anyway).
> The cast to void __user * should be done in the ioctl
> demultiplexer vt_ioctl(), and the ioctl ugliness should not
> invade cleaner child functions such as vt_event_wait_ioctl().
>
> - same for vt_event_wait_ioctl() - it passes in a type damaged by
> ioctl's limitations. Such type limitations and ioctl demuxing
> artifacts should be kept local to vt_ioctl().
That had already occurred to me. The events should also become a mask so
you can wait for several at once. What I wanted to know was whether such
an interface actually meets Lennart's requirements.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists