linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] doc: missing value 2 for randomize-va-space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907031200560.4994@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:01:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Horst Schirmeier <horst@...irmeier.com>
Cc:	rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: missing value 2 for randomize-va-space


[ added Ingo to CC ]

On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Horst Schirmeier wrote:

> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > >      There a few legacy applications out there (such as some ancient
> > 
> > ... would you please fix this typo/grammo as well? (There a few ...)
> > 
> > >      versions of libc.so.5 from 1996) that assume that brk area starts
> > 
> > Also, the text itself doesn't seem to be super-clear ... namely, it 
> > describes what CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is about, but doesn't really clarify how 
> > exactly does this correlate with randomize_va_space == 2. Would you mind 
> > also fixing this bit?
> 
> I hope I didn't misread the sources :-)  Opinions?
> 
> ---
> 
> The documentation for /proc/sys/kernel/* does not mention the possible
> value 2 for randomize-va-space yet.  While being there, doing some
> reformatting, fixing grammar problems and clarifying the correlations
> between randomize-va-space, kernel parameter "norandmaps" and the
> CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK option.
>                                                     
> Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier <horst@...irmeier.com>

Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>

Ingo, will you take this through your tree?

> 
> ---
>  Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt |   30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt b/Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt
> index 322a00b..dd8322f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt
> @@ -303,25 +303,29 @@ This option can be used to select the type of process address
>  space randomization that is used in the system, for architectures
>  that support this feature.
>  
> -0 - Turn the process address space randomization off by default.
> +0 - Turn the process address space randomization off.  This is the
> +    default for architectures that do not support this feature anyways,
> +    and kernels that are booted with the "norandmaps" parameter.
>  
>  1 - Make the addresses of mmap base, stack and VDSO page randomized.
>      This, among other things, implies that shared libraries will be
> -    loaded to random addresses. Also for PIE-linked binaries, the location
> -    of code start is randomized.
> +    loaded to random addresses.  Also for PIE-linked binaries, the
> +    location of code start is randomized.  This is the default if the
> +    CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK option is enabled.
>  
> -    With heap randomization, the situation is a little bit more
> -    complicated.
> -    There a few legacy applications out there (such as some ancient
> +2 - Additionally enable heap randomization.  This is the default if
> +    CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is disabled.
> +
> +    There are a few legacy applications out there (such as some ancient
>      versions of libc.so.5 from 1996) that assume that brk area starts
> -    just after the end of the code+bss. These applications break when
> -    start of the brk area is randomized. There are however no known
> +    just after the end of the code+bss.  These applications break when
> +    start of the brk area is randomized.  There are however no known
>      non-legacy applications that would be broken this way, so for most
> -    systems it is safe to choose full randomization. However there is
> -    a CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK option for systems with ancient and/or broken
> -    binaries, that makes heap non-randomized, but keeps all other
> -    parts of process address space randomized if randomize_va_space
> -    sysctl is turned on.
> +    systems it is safe to choose full randomization.
> +
> +    Systems with ancient and/or broken binaries should be configured
> +    with CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK enabled, which excludes the heap from process
> +    address space randomization.
>  
>  ==============================================================
>  
> 
> -- 
> PGP-Key 0xD40E0E7A
> 

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/