[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090703102325.GK5880@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:23:25 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: extend pipe() to support NULL argument.
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:59:10PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Amerigo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>>>I said: It just a special case. Fixing sendfile() won't fix everything.
>>
>> What do you want? Just saving an fd, isn't it?
>>
>> sendfile() does this but you said it's buggy, if you fix it, what is the
>> rest problem?
>>
>You should know why Linux invented splice(2). Not all of the problems
>can be solved by sendfile(2).
Sure, it definitely can be seen from the interface....
>
>>>
>>>In fact, sendfile(2) is implemented via splice(2) infrastructure. The
>>>logic is the same, and much clever than yours. Dive into its code, you
>>>will find the reason why it must be blocked on outfd.
>>
>>
>> Sure, this is done in user-space, definitely....
>>
>Did you review the code of sendfile(2)?
Not at all.
I just wanted to show what I wanted to say, not to re-implement
sendfile(2).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists