[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090703102953.GF32128@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:29:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware
vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> Performance counter stats for '/usr/bin/rhythmbox /home/jaswinder/Music/singhiskinng.mp3':
>
> 17552264 vec-adds (scaled from 66.28%)
> 19715258 vec-muls (scaled from 66.63%)
> 15862733 vec-divs (scaled from 66.82%)
> 23735187095 vec-idle-cycles (scaled from 66.89%)
> 11353159 vec-stall-cycles (scaled from 66.90%)
> 36628571 vec-ops (scaled from 66.48%)
Is stall-cycles equivalent to busy-cycles? I.e. do we have this
general relationship to the cycle event:
cycles = vec-stall-cycles + vec-idle-cycles
?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists