[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246622515.2322.30.camel@jaswinder.satnam>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:31:55 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware
interrupt support for AMD
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 13:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > $ ./perf stat -e interrupts -e masked -e int-pending-mask-cycles -- ls -lR /usr/include/ > /dev/null
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'ls -lR /usr/include/':
> >
> > 377 interrupts
> > 53429936 int-mask-cycles
> > 1119 int-pending-mask-cycles
> >
> > 0.371457539 seconds time elapsed
>
> Agreed, this is another useful generalization - and the 'cycles
> pending' metrics are not retrievable via any software means.
>
> We could and should probably add a software counter for hardirqs as
> wel. That would allow the vector/irqnr information to be passed in,
> and it would allow architectures without irq metrics in the PMU to
> have this counter too.
>
Please let me know that addition of software counter will be in this
patch or we can do it incrementally after this patch.
Thanks,
--
JSR
http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists