linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vt: add an event interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090703154845.GB13580@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 17:48:45 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: add an event interface

* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> > The thing is, you didnt really answer my question whether you 
> > consider yourself to be accountable to the same standards of 
> > quality as other upstream kernel contributors?
> 
> I did answer it, I guess you didn't like the answer ?

You did not answer it really, you questioned the validity of the 
question:

| > Also, isnt it a double standard: why should newbies be held to 
| > higher standards than you hold yourself to?
|
| Why should anyone be held up to bogus standards ?
|
| [...]

So did i get you right that in your opinion sending and writing 
clean code is a 'bogus standard'? Sorry about trying to interpret 
you here, i have no choice because you did not reply to my question.

I thought the obvious portions of Documentation/CodingStyle applied 
to everyone - so it applies to you only if you like it?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/