linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Adds a read-only "procs" file similar to "tasks" that shows only unique tgids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6599ad830907031054x74d90149y38aae60afa403d58@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:54:48 -0700
From:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Benjamin Blum <bblum@...gle.com>, lizf@...fujitzu.com,
	serue@...ibm.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Adds a read-only "procs" file similar to "tasks" that 
	shows only unique tgids

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Andrew Morton<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I think you're saying "for each pid N in the cgroup, set the Nth
> element in an IDR tree".

Right.

> That would work.  And it automatically gives
> ordered traversal and dupe removal.
>
> I don't think IDRs permit in-order traversal, whereas radix-trees do
> support this.

I thought that an IDR *was* a form of radix tree.

Looking at the IDR API it doesn't appear support the notion of "insert
an entry with id N" anyway.

> Unfortunately radix-trees are presented as operating on
> void* data, so one would need to do some typecasting when storing
> BITS_PER_LONG-sized bitfields inside them.

That would mean adding something a bit like the IDA wrapper that
converts IDR to deal with bitfields?

Is the benefit of avoiding a vmalloc() at all costs really worth the
additional complexity, versus just doing:

if (size > 2 * PAGE_SIZE) {
  array = vmalloc(size);
} else {
  array = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
}

?

That would only require vmalloc on cgroups with >2048 tasks, which is
going to be pretty rare, and is way simpler.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/