lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4E5738.6080407@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:08:40 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	lkml@...eThan.org
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug Fix]: Do 32-bit table calculations in pre-processor

On 07/03/09 11:38, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> I make no claims for it at the moment - too early in the test process.
> Just the general observation that it takes 0.5M to describe 0.5G of ram.
>   
Only if you're using 4k pages.  With large pages, 1 pte can map 2M, so
256 entries can map 512M, so you only need 1/2 a page of pagetable
(assuming PAE; if not a single entry can map 4M).

> Also, 
> the observation that (1<<32) drops the bit off the left end of a 32-bit value.
> You can see the result in the portion of the post you snipped out.  ;)
>   

Those computations aren't done as 32-bit.

$ as << EOF
.data
.byte (1 << 100) >> 100
EOF
$ objdump -D a.out

a.out:     file format elf64-x86-64

Disassembly of section .data:

0000000000000000 <.data>:
   0:    01                       .byte 0x1


    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ