[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830907040910k5c9d720bqafdf596bbc005783@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 09:10:58 -0700
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Blum <bblum@...gle.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lizf@...fujitzu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Adds a read-only "procs" file similar to "tasks" that
shows only unique tgids
2009/7/3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>:
> Anyway, above algorithm shows that it's enough to have per-cgroup bitmap
> (size can be dinamically changed) rather than big table and ugly sort().
> How about adding per-cgroup taskid bitmap ?
> clear/set is very easy.
>
A per-cgroup bitmap of task ids would mean (assuming that it's
implemented as a sparse tree like an IDA) that you'd add extra
allocations and possible failure points in the fork path - right now
the fork overhead imposed by the cgroups framework itself is just
linking yourself into your parent's css_set and bumping its refcount.
I guess there probably are workloads where doing more work at
fork/exit time and less at "tasks" scan time is a win, but that has to
be balanced against those where fork/exit performance is more
critical, and the fact that it would be adding another way that fork
could fail.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists