linux-kernel - Re: [RFC -tip] x86,apic -- reduce disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:38:52 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] x86,apic -- reduce disable_apic usage

On Sun, 5 Jul 2009, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

> Here is an attempt to bring more consistency for apic
> presence check. I hope I covered all the code flows.
> Though it's RFC. Please review and test if possible.
> 
> 	-- Cyrill
> ---
> Instead of messing with (cpu_has_apic|disable_apic)
> to check if we have apic functional, better to distinguish
> them by logical kind. cpu_has_apic -- to check if we may
> use apic functionality, disable_apic -- to note that
> apic was disabled via command line.

 How do you set cpu_has_apic for systems with discrete local APICs?  The 
CPUID flag is not set in this case.

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/