linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] avr32: add two new at91 to cpu.h definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090706111954.723badb9@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:19:54 +0200
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, kernel@...32linux.org,
	patrice.vilchez@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nicolas.ferre@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avr32: add two new at91 to cpu.h definition

Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Somme common drivers will need those at91 cpu_is_xxx() definitions. As
> at91sam9g10 and at91sam9g45 are on the way to linus' tree, here is the patch
> that adds those chips to cpu.h in AVR32 architecture.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

Acked-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>

> ---
> Inclusion in linux-2.6-arm.git/devel:
> 
> at91sam9g10: b784b7c03723891876c9053c589150a4062f9455
> at91sam9g45: fddcc0ae58edefeb7ac1e460411d7dfbe8ebdacc

Do you want me to take this patch, or is it better if it goes in along
the rest through the ARM tree?

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/