linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Re: /proc/uptime idle counter remains at 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907061709090.11605@venus.araneidae.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:09:51 +0100 (BST)
From:	Michael Abbott <michael@...neidae.co.uk>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
cc:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: /proc/uptime idle counter remains at 0

On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Monday 2009-07-06 17:48, Michael Abbott wrote:
> >[...]
> >why am I still allowing uptime to overflow in a year and four months or 
> >so?
> Is not this addressed by 64-bit jiffies already?

Possibly, sorry, not terribly familiar with the underlying infrastructure,
just trying to fix one bug without being dragged under by all the rest!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/