[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6BC3DACB-2179-4322-B270-475180CC8AA2@it-loops.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:07:34 +0200
From: Michael Guntsche <mike@...loops.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic
On Jul 6, 2009, at 19:17, Alan Cox wrote:
> This is the more drastic way of doing it. I had hoped to put this
> off but
> in fact it cleans stuff up enormously. This has had only basic testing
> but the underlying idea is to simply remove all the pty special casing
> that causes messes in the first place.
<snip>
Hi Alan,
Must commit a6540f731d506d9e82444cf0020e716613d4c46c still be reverted
with your patch or can it stay in?
Kind regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists