[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246906357.11545.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:52:37 -0700
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:08 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been
> multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of
> these problems.
>
> This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a complete fix.
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.3/01073.html
>
> I am currently running some stress tests to make sure there are no issues with
> these patches. But, wanted to send them out for review/comments/testing
> before I head out for the long weekend.
>
> If this patchset seems sane, the first patch in the patchset should also get
> into 30.stable.
>
Just an update. I ran some stress test on few of my test machines over
the long weekend and havent seen any issues with this patchset.
Thanks,
Venki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists